Debate is Pointless

-
Debate lacks a mechanism for resolution, making it pointless.

There are two kinds of assumptions: starting assumptions (axioms) and auxillary assumptions. All belief systems require axioms. To deduce something about reality, you need to start with assumptions about reality.

Where do assumptions come from? The answer is our subjective experience. One chooses axioms based what best fits with the nature of one's mind. By implication from definition, an axiom does NOT require logical justification. 

Axioms are subjective and therefore non-negotiable. That is to say: nobody can evaluate anybody else's axioms. Since debates are inherently formatted to compare peoples axioms against each other, it follows that debates are pointless. There is no point in negotiating things non-negotiable.

What can in fact be negotiated is how strongly or weakly a person's statement is supported by said person's axioms. However, the way that debates are formatted lack this capability. A more compatible format for matching statements to axioms would be a back-and-forth dialogue—one with a neutral moderator that fact checks important details upon debator request. (Requests should have restrictions to minimize risk of stalling or disrupting the flow of dialogue).

Verdict: Until then, debate is pointless.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Improving Your Chess

-
If you are just starting out in chess, focus on playing many enjoyable games and developing your board vision. Otherwise, read on! Most players waste time studying things that rarely decide their games. The goal of training is simple: work on the things that affect, or are expected to affect, your results. How do you know what those things are?  Review your games. They can be slow games or blitz games. Personal game review is the foundation of a chess education. In fact, chess improvement largely comes down to playing games and reviewing them. If a recurring weakness appears, train for that weakness specifically. In this sense, your games write your training program. How should you review your games?  By following  GM Noël Studer's 3x3 method . First, use a chess engine (e.g., Stockfish) to identify up to three of your own game-changing mistakes. Then—for each mistake, ask yourself three questions: What was my idea? Why is my idea wrong? How is the alternative better? Onc...
Read more

The Problem with Catholicism

-
Catholicism has a strong lineage of philosophers that comprise today's frontier of academic Christian philosophy. As a truth relativist, I do not attack Catholic theology. While Catholicism affirms absolute truth, its theology is internally coherent—meaning it can easily coexist with my worldview. Since my truth relativism views truth as relative to paradigms, my critiques focus on behavioral norms rather than coherent ideas.  I reject modern culture. Catholicism has a strange conviction to negotiate with modern culture, and does a poor job of resisting its vices. So, I reject Catholicism. I reject modern culture for a reason: it ruins almost everything it touches. This is an evidence-based observation and not prejudice. Negotiating with modernity has damaged Catholicism much. The most reliable metric for foreseeing societal decay is a high out-of-wedlock birthrate. Unfortunately, specific data on Catholic out-of-wedlock births is scarce (though it roughly mirrors modern Protestant...
Read more

Applying Simplicity to Chess

-
Simplicity is conceptual minimalism, meaning fewest concepts needed to master. Chess is a battle of ideas. Ideas are relative to a position's elements. Chess games have three stages—opening, middlegame, and endgame—each defined by a characteristic set of elements. In all stages of the game, always keep your eyes peeled for tactics. Tactics are just ideas that ought to be prevented. You ought to prevent your opponent from using a tactic, and you ought to use a tactic should you have one. A good example of this is a forced checkmating sequence. In the opening stage, you should play moves that: develop your pieces; get your king to safety; or, fight for the central squares. Alekhine—a former world champion—argued that the opening shapes the middlegame, and the middlegame shapes the endgame. At the highest level, this makes opening theory critical. Below the master level, opening theory rarely decides the game. But the concepts still matter for everyone. Piece development, king safety...
Read more